OOPS! DID WHITE HOUSE JUST EXPOSE ANOTHER RICE LIE? Obama administration explanation opens more questions about Benghazi attacks
Posted on November 19, 2012 at 11:49 AM EST
By Aaron Klein
TEL AVIV — In the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks in Libya, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice may have deliberately misled the public when she went on multiple television shows and called the facility that had been targeted a ‚Äúconsulate.‚ÄĚ
The difference between branding the Benghazi facility a ‚Äúmission‚ÄĚ or a ‚Äúconsulate‚ÄĚ may be crucial in determining what was really going on in the building.
As¬†KleinOnline was first to report, the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi actually served as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the rebel-led insurgencies in the Middle East, according to Middle Eastern security officials.
Many rebel fighters are openly members of terrorist organizations, including al-Qaida.
A good deal of media attention and political criticism has been focused on Rice‚Äôs other statements immediately after the Benghazi attacks, primarily her blaming of an obscure YouTube film vilifying the Islamic figure Muhammad for what she claimed were popular protests that took place outside the U.S. mission.
Video and intelligence evidence has demonstrated there were no popular protests outside the Benghazi facility that day and that the attack was carried out by jihadists.
However, in defending itself against new claims that the White House may have scrubbed the CIA’s initial intelligence assessment on the Benghazi attacks of references to al-Qaida, Obama administration officials may have unintentionally implicated themselves in another, until now unnoticed scandal,¬†KleinOnline has learned.
Over the weekend, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes contended the White House made only small, factual edits to the CIA’s intelligence assessment, referring to one edit in particular.
“We were provided with points by the intelligence community that represented their assessment,” Rhodes said aboard Air Force One en route to Asia. “The only edit made by the White House was the factual edit about how to refer to the facility.‚ÄĚ
Rhodes said the White House and State Department changed a reference in the CIA report from “consulate” to “diplomatic facility.‚ÄĚ
“Other than that, we were guided by the points that were provided by the intelligence community. So I can‚Äôt speak to any other edits that may have been made.‚ÄĚ
Further, Politico reported Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, was adamant that the White House only changed the reference to the Benghazi facility.
‚ÄúThere was only one thing that was changed ‚Ä¶ and that was, the word ‚Äėconsulate‚Äô was changed to ‚Äėmission,‚Äô‚ÄĚ Feinstein said. ‚ÄúThat‚Äôs the only change that anyone in the White House made, and I have checked this out.‚ÄĚ
If the White House intentionally changed the reference to the Benghazi facility from a ‚Äúconsulate‚ÄĚ to a ‚Äúmission,‚ÄĚ why did Rice repeatedly refer to the facility as a ‚Äú consulate‚ÄĚ when she engaged in a media blitz in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attacks?
In a Sept. 16 interview on NBC‚Äôs ‚ÄúMeet The Press,‚ÄĚ Rice twice labeled the facility a ‚Äúconsulate.‚ÄĚ
In a subsequent interview on CBS‚Äôs ‚ÄúThis Morning,” she again referred to the facility as a ‚Äúconsulate.‚ÄĚ
This is what Benghazi ‚Äėconsulate‚Äô really was
KleinOnline¬†was first to report the Benghazi facility was not a ‚Äúconsulate.‚ÄĚ
Instead the U.S. diplomatic mission served as a meeting place to coordinate aid for the jihadists fighting insurgencies in the Middle East, according to Middle Eastern security officials.
Among the tasks performed inside the building was collaborating with Arab countries on the recruitment of fighters ‚Äď including jihadists ‚Äď to target Bashar al-Assad‚Äôs regime in Syria.
The distinction may help explain why there was no major public security presence at what has been described as a ‚Äúconsulate.‚ÄĚ Such a presence would draw attention to the shabby, nondescript building that was allegedly used for such sensitive purposes.
Since the mission was attacked, countless news media reports around the world have referred to the obscure post as a U.S. consulate. That theme continues to permeate the media, with articles daily referencing a ‚Äúconsulate‚ÄĚ in Benghazi.
A consulate typically refers to the building that officially houses a consul, who is the official representatives of the government of one state in the territory of another. The U.S. consul in Libya, Jenny Cordell, works out of the embassy in Tripoli.
Consulates at times function as junior embassies, providing services related to visas, passports and citizen information.
On Aug. 26, about two weeks before his was killed, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens attended a ceremony marking the opening of consular services at the Tripoli embassy.
‚ÄúI‚Äôm happy to announce that starting on Monday, August 27, we are ready to offer a full range of consular services to Libyans,‚ÄĚ stated Stevens at the ceremony in Tripoli. ‚ÄúThis means non-immigrant visas, as well as assistance to Americans residing in, or visiting, Libya.‚ÄĚ
The main role of a consulate is to foster trade with the host and care for its own citizens who are traveling or living in the host nation.
Diplomatic missions, on the other hand, maintain a more generalized role. A diplomatic mission is simply a group of people from one state or an international inter-governmental organization present in another state to represent matters of the sending state or organization in the receiving state.
The State Department website lists no consulate in Benghazi.
According to Middle Eastern security officials, the so-called consulate was more of a diplomatic meeting place for U.S. officials, including Stevens.
The security officials divulged the building was routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad‚Äôs regime in Syria.
Last month, the State Department gave a vivid account of Stevens‚Äô final day during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. It was disclosed that about an hour before the attack began, Stevens concluded his final meeting of the day with a Turkish diplomat. Turkey has been leading the insurgency against Assad‚Äôs regime.
In September, WND broke the story that Stevens played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad‚Äôs regime in Syria, according to Egyptian security officials.
Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad‚Äôs forces, said the security officials.
The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.
Stevens and three other American diplomats were killed on Sept. 11 in an attack blamed on Islamists.
One witness to the mob scene in Libya said some of the gunmen attacking the U.S. installation had identified themselves as members of Ansar al-Shariah, which represents al-Qaida in Yemen and Libya.
The al-Qaida offshoot released a statement denying its members were behind the deadly attack, but a man identified as a leader of the Ansar brigade told Al Jazeera the group indeed took part in the Benghazi attack.
Al-Qaida among U.S.-supported rebels
Questions remain about the nature of U.S. support for the revolutions in Egypt and Libya, including reports the U.S.-aided rebels that toppled Muammar Gadhafi‚Äôs regime in Libya consisted of al-Qaida and jihad groups. The U.S. provided direct assistance, including weapons and finances, to the Libyan rebels.
Similarly, the Obama administration is currently aiding the rebels fighting Assad‚Äôs regime in Syria amid widespread reports that al-Qaida jihadists are included in the ranks of the Free Syrian Army. Earlier this month, Obama announced $50 million more in aid to the Syrian rebels.
During the revolution against Gadhafi‚Äôs regime, the U.S. admitted to directly arming the rebel groups.
At the time, rebel leader Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi admitted in an interview that a significant number of the Libyan rebels were al-Qaida fighters, many of whom had fought U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He insisted his fighters ‚Äúare patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists,‚ÄĚ but he added that the ‚Äúmembers of al-Qaida are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader.‚ÄĚ
Adm. James Stavridis, NATO supreme commander for Europe, admitted Libya‚Äôs rebel force may include al-Qaida: ‚ÄúWe have seen flickers in the intelligence of potential al-Qaida, Hezbollah.‚ÄĚ
Former CIA officer Bruce Riedel went even further, telling the Hindustan Times: ‚ÄúThere is no question that al-Qaida‚Äôs Libyan franchise, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, is a part of the opposition. It has always been Gadhafi‚Äôs biggest enemy and its stronghold is Benghazi. What is unclear is how much of the opposition is al-Qaida/Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ‚Äď 2 percent or 80 percent.‚ÄĚ
In Syria, meanwhile, the U.S. may be currently supporting al-Qaida and other jihadists fighting with the rebels targeting Assad‚Äôs regime.
In August,¬†KleinOnline quoted a senior Syrian source claiming at least 500 hardcore mujahedeen from Afghanistan, many of whom were spearheading efforts to fight the U.S. there, were killed in clashes with Syrian forces last month.
Also in September,¬†KleinOnline reported Jihadiya Salafia in the Gaza Strip, a group that represents al-Qaida in the coastal territory, had declared three days of mourning for its own jihadists who died in Syria in recent weeks.
There have been widespread reports of al-Qaida among the Syrian rebels, including in reports by Reuters and the New York Times.
KleinOnline reported in May there was growing collaboration between the Syrian opposition and al-Qaida as well as evidence the opposition is sending weapons to jihadists in Iraq, according to an Egyptian security official.
The military official¬†said that Egypt has reports of collaboration between the Syrian opposition and three al-Qaida arms, including one the operates in Libya:
- Jund al-Sham, which is made up of al-Qaida militants who are Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese;
- Jund al-Islam, which in recent years merged with Ansar al-Islam, an extremist¬†group of Sunni Iraqis operating under the al-Qaida banner and operating in¬†Yemen and Libya;
- Jund¬†Ansar al-Allah, an al-Qaida group based in Gaza linked to Palestinian¬†camps in Lebanon and Syria.
U.S. officials have stated the White House is providing nonlethal aid to the Syrian rebels while widespread reports have claimed the U.S. has been working with Arab countries to ensure the opposition in Syria is well armed.
With additional research by Joshua Klein.