PHOTO: Hamas missile launch pad next to mosque, playground. Civilian factories, gas station also half a block from Fajr-5 firing site.

IDF photo showing proximity of missile launch site to mosque, playground, civilian factories.


By Aaron Klein

TEL AVIV – A missile launch site in the Gaza Strip was set up by Hamas just half a block from a mosque and children’s playground, according to aerial photographs provided to KleinOnline by the Israel Defense Forces today.

Israel on Wednesday carried out a surgical strike of the site in question – a Fajr-5 missile launch pad established in the heavily populated Zeitoun district of Gaza to fire long range rockets into the Jewish state.

The photograph of the launch site, posted above, shows a children’s playground and a mosque located about a half a block away as well as two civilian factories and a gas station also within a half a block radius.

In a new development, Hamas on Friday said it fired a rocket toward Jerusalem. Air sirens were heard in Jerusalem and the surrounding areas. Security sources confirmed one rocket had landed in an open area in a Palestinian village just outside Gush Etzion, a suburb located south of Jerusalem near Bethlehem.

Abu Abdullah, a spokesperson for Hamas’ so-called military wing, the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, told KleinOnline today the rocket fired at Jerusalem was aimed at the Knesset, or Israel’s parliament.

Abdullah also claimed Hamas was targeting the official residence of Israeli President Shimon Peres with the Jerusalem rocket fire.

“This is not the end of the surprises we can have,” Abdullah said.

“In some circumstances, Tel Aviv and Jerusalem will not be the last station of our targets.”

On both Friday and today air raid sirens were blasted in Tel Aviv and explosions could be heard.

In a dramatic display, today’s rocket fired at Tel Aviv was intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome battery system, which had deployed in the region just hours earlier.

That rocket added to more than 240 Iron Dome interceptions throughout Israel since the beginning of what the Jewish state is calling Operation Pillar of Defense.

Since the beginning of that operation, more than 400 rockets have hit Israeli territory. Five Israeli civilians and 4 soldiers were injured by rocket fire today.

Meanwhile, Israel has been taking preparations for a possible ground operation into Gaza. The Israel Defense Forces said over 16,000 reservists have been mobilized, out of the now 75,000 approved for call-up by the Israeli government

The IDF told KleinOnline the Paratrooper and Givati Infantry brigades have completed what they say are final preparations for a potential ground operation. The forces are currently outside Gaza on standby awaiting orders.


NOTE: ‘Aaron Klein Radio’ will be broadcasting live from Tel Aviv on Sunday. Click here for details.


  • Anonymous


  • Pingback: Vital ingredient left out of the recipe: the truth | A CROOKED PATH

  • Pingback: 2013 honda civic si redesign

  • Pingback: November 21, 2012 | Another Slow News Day

  • Pingback: Huffington Post: Shill for Hamas Terrorists » Choosing Life - God's Gift To The Unborn

  • Pingback: Free Money

  • Pingback: Lux Libertas – Light and Liberty » Another Palestinian Fraud Exposed

  • Pingback: Iranian Arms Ship Bound for Gaza Found Carrying Long-Range Fajr-5 Rockets Able to Reach Tel Aviv, Jerusalem | | Prepper Podcast Radio Network

  • Pingback: Another Palestinian Fraud Exposed » Choosing Life - God's Gift To The Unborn

  • Pingback: Another Palestinian Fraud Exposed | Vision America

  • Granny Rob Robinson

    Hit their launch pad any which way we can! They want war? Give it to them.

  • gobidiction

    Kill all the Terrorists.
    Kill them now.
    Kill them without mercy.
    Kill them.

  • Anonymous

    When will one of their errant missiles land on a mosque?

  • Bob Hamilton, Expert

    By “aiming” they mean, wishing.

  • Pingback: REPORT: TWITTER suspends Orthodox Jew’s account after tweeting anti-Obama cartoon… : Bilco's Domain

  • Pingback: PHOTO: Hamas missile launch pad next to mosque, playground… : Bilco's Domain

  • ano

    all those money in this world….wheres the so much hip about the precision guidance (plus-minus) 2 feet missile/ bomb? pathetic …

  • Pingback: AP ‘corrects’ story calling Jerusalem capital of Israel… : Bilco's Domain

  • Pingback: REPORT: CNN uses footage of faked Palestinian ‘injuries’… : Bilco's Domain

  • Pingback: HAMAS TARGETS JERUSALEM… : Bilco's Domain

  • Dean Jackson

    Firstly, the term “Palestinian” was a national designation given to the inhabitants of the Jewish Homeland in 1922. Other than that, it had no ethnic/intrinsic nationalist* value, which is why the territory was re-named Israel on May 14, 1948 when the Jews declared independence.

    Secondly, Arab governments resurrected the defunct “Palestinian” name in 1964 (at the first Arab League summit in Cairo, Egypt, where the PLO was officially created and launched) when they were forced to alter their strategy towards Israel, because Israel in 1963 had either tested their first nuclear bomb or actually acquired their first nuclear bomb.**

    This brings us to the Six-Day War, which was planned (with the cooperation of the USSR) to be lost by Arab governments, so as to operationalize the Arab governments’ proxy strategy, using the newly-minted “Palestinians”.

    Note that Arab governments never did create an “Arab” state for West Bank/Gaza inhabitants between 1948 – 1963, nor a “Palestinian” state (when “Arabs” was changed to “Palestinians”) between 1964 – May 1967.

    The next phase of the Arab governments’ Long-Range Strategy will be to have Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza renounce their claim for an independent state and opt to become Israeli citizens instead, which is what they are according to the Palestine Mandate of 1922. When one throws in Arabs living in the refugee camps, the Jewish inhabitants of Israel will be electorally out-voted, leading to the reincorporation of the territory that is now Israel back into the Arab fold.

    There is, however, one tactic that Israel will use to thwart the “new” Arab governments’ Long-Range Strategy:

    Israel’s counter-strategy to offset the looming Arab electoral majority will be to offer Jews living all over the world automatic Israeli citizenship, thereby conferring the right to vote in Israeli elections, swinging the electoral balance back overwhelmingly to the Jewish side.

    Contemporaneous with events described above, watch for the fake “collapse” of the Chinese Communist government (following the last major Communist disinformation operation: The fraudulent collapse of the USSR. Both disinformation operations fall under the “Long-Range Policy”, the “new” strategy all Communist nations signed onto in 1960 to defeat the West.), when soon after that “collapse” Mexico will request the “assistance” of Chinese troops in combating the then spreading Mexico City-manufactured “drug wars” there. America, however, will be stymied from preventing the presence of Chinese troops in Mexico due to emergencies that will “suddenly” crop up in the Korean peninsula, the Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.
    *”The First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations (in Jerusalem, February 1919), which met for the purpose of selecting a Palestinian Arab representative for the Paris Peace Conference, adopted the following resolution: “We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. We are connected with it by national, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds.”[60]” – Wikipedia, “Palestinian People”.


    “An all-Palestine Congress was held in Jerusalem between January 27 and February 10, 1919, to formulate a common policy, called “program”, on Palestine to advise Faisal while attending the Paris Peace Conference on behalf of the Arabs. The Jerusalem Congress was presided over by ‘Aref Pasha al-Dajani who was, at the time, the president of the Jerusalem branch of the Muslim-Christian Association mentioned earlier. (Representatives of the Association also attended the General Syrian Congress in Damascus.)(8)

    The Jerusalem Congress, resolved to reject political Zionism and to accept British assistance on condition such assistance would not impinge upon Sovereignty in Palestine.(9) Basically, the Congress wanted Palestine to be part of an independent Syrian State to be governed by Faisal of the Hashemite family. It also preferred U.S. political tutelage, should this be necessary, or British tutelage, as a second choice, but under no circumstances would the Congress accept French political guardianship.” – PALESTINE: FACTIONALISM IN THE NATIONAL MOVEMENT (1919 – 1939), DR. MANUEL HASSASSIAN.

    Note that DR. MANUEL HASSASSIAN inadvertently admits to the lie of the “distinct Palestinian People” when he writes, “Basically, the Congress wanted Palestine to be part of an independent Syrian State to be governed by Faisal of the Hashemite family.”

    In these consultations between Arab elites of Palestine circa 1919-1920, there was NO mention of the “distinct ethnic Palestinian people”. They referred to themselves as Syrian, Arab.

    ** Note: Arab governments held their first Arab League summit the very year after Israel’s reputed first test (or acquisition) of a nuclear bomb. The summit was necessary in order to implement a new Pan Arab government “Long-Range Strategy” towards Israel.

    Dean Michael Jackson
    Washington, DC

    • Real Rick

      Wow Dean, you sure use a lot of words to say nothing at all. Were you in Obama’s speech class?

      • Dean Jackson

        Ah, a non denial denial reply, meaning you’re disingenuous. Who are you?

        Then you say I, “…say nothing at all”! Who are you trying to kid or misdirect here? Obviously I’ve hit a nerve here with you and whoever you represent.

      • Anonymous

        Your response is puerile idiocy. Why not provide substance?

      • Anonymous

        “Real Rick” … do you have reading comprehension issues? Because I read that entire post, and found a great deal of value in it (including some information I had not been aware of, and will now attempt to independently confirm/deny).

        What was the point of your “post” here. He said a lot, and all of value… you said very little, and of absolutely zero value.

        It’s one thing to say “I hate reading, so I won’t read something long.” That’s your choice. It’s something else entirely to say “I don’t want anyone else to read things I don’t want to read so I’ll ATTACK those posting those things I don’t want to read.”

        All you did was made an obnoxious, snarky comment. The “Obama” line makes it SEEM like you might be on the “right” but the TONE of your post is absolutely the standard for those on the left. So… you might want to reconsider your approach.

  • Real Rick

    The muslims don’t care if their kids get whacked. They can get the stupid USA media to film them crying crocodile tears. Israel go ahead and take them out. They’ll just be Jew-haters when they grow up, trying to figure out more ways to kill you.

    • Dean Jackson

      Muslim’s certainly do have the same emotions as all human parents have for their children, but fake Muslim politicians don’t. There’s little Arabs living in Gaza and the West Bank can do to change circumstances they have no control over. You see, “elections” in Gaza and the West Bank are manipulated behind the scenes.

      Your sad state of mind towards Muslims is akin to the propaganda Nazis were feeding the greater German population about Jews from 1933-1945!

      • Anonymous

        Dean, you’re largely correct, but I have to say, there’s more than a little sliver of truth in Rick’s comment (as obviously, and purposefully INFLAMMATORY as it is).

        The issue is that while, yes, you are correct, all human beings have the same basic wiring. There are psychopaths and sociopaths in all cultures… and the majority of people in the world are neither of the above.

        But it’s remarkable how effective life-long indoctrination can be to “twist” those normal, human responses we all share. And, if you’ve studied Islam in depth, you can see how it’s so incredibly well-suited to justify evil at every turn, and to allow people who want “good” to nevertheless pursue things that any sane person would view as undeniably “evil.”

        Remember… in that culture, if you are born to a Muslim family, you’re “born a Muslim,” and you are a Muslim, and if you’re a Muslim and want to explore NOT being a Muslim, that’s a mortal sin against Allah. Some local implementation of Sharia require immediate execution for this sort of “apostasy.” Others will simply scourge the “apostate” until they “re-accept Islam.” At least, the first time. If they do it a second time, death is mandatory.

        So… we have to acknowledge that not every “Muslim” is an ACTUAL MUSLIM. Maybe we can differentiate between them, in linguistic terms, by saying “devout Muslims” versus “cultural Muslims?”

        Cultural Muslims, in many cases, fit the description you give, at least to some extent. Devout Muslims, however, don’t… those who really believe that their kid, if killed in battle with Jews, will have a higher place in “Paradise”… well, it’s only “good and loving parentage” to strap a bomb to their kid’s chest and march him into a line of Israeli troops, isn’t it?

        That’s what Islam does, and does so effectively. It twists “good impulses” in a way which allows them to be used to pursue EVIL ends.

        Just what you’d expect from “Lucifer wearing his God disguise”… aka Allah. Don’t you think?

        • Dean Jackson

          You say, “…those who really believe that their kid, if killed in battle with Jews, will have a higher place in “Paradise”… well, it’s only “good and loving parentage” to strap a bomb to their kid’s chest and march him into a line of Israeli troops, isn’t it?”

          There are norms to Islam as set by Muhammad that his descendants in power today choose to forget for expediency sake. The use of children in such a manner is a crime, since they are not mentally capable to properly choose if they want to become “martyrs” for Islam. Also, combatants are supposed to be in uniform.

          • Anonymous

            Dean, I have been TOLD the same sort of thing you just said… but upon actually studying the life and words of Mohammed, I can say that there is absolutely no evidence to support what you just claimed.

            Please, by all means, though… show me the “norms” which you claim that Mohammed set forth which have been “forgotten” today. Please provide references. I’ve read several of the “most accepted” (among Muslims) biographies of Mohammed. I have read all of the most accepted Hadith, and most of the “intermediate” ones as well. (I haven’t read the disputed ones at this point, because they have very little bearing on actions or attitudes within modern Islam).

            I have lots of “norms” I’ve found that are in direct dispute with your claim.

            See, you’re trying to promote the idea that “today’s radical Islam is a corruption of ‘true Islam.'” That is a LIE, plain and simple.

            “Today’s radical Islam” is TRUE ISLAM. Those who wish to “reform” Islam are the ones who are deviating from Islam as set forth by Mohammed (and, supposedly, by “Allah.”)

            The “radicalization” of Islam today is really a “getting back to our roots” movement within Islam… and that’s very, very important to understand. As Islam’s significant waned, a belief began to be held that the reason Islam was waning was because they’d strayed too far from “original Islam.” They’d become too “modernized” and too “tolerant” and so forth. When the Islamist movement was begun, in the mid-20th century, through the foundation of the Muslim Brotherhood (The “granddaddy” of all radical Islamic movements today, including AL Qaeda, Hamas, Hexbolla, and so forth), the whole point was to “return to a strict adherence to the letter of the Koran and the Hadith.”

            You can call it a “corruption” but that’s simply not true. You can call it a “politicalization of Islam” but Islam is BY DEFINITION, POLITICAL. (The idea of separation of the two is wholly alien to Islam… and to try to foist that on them is simply foolishness.)

          • Dean Jackson

            clbrown says, “See, you’re trying to promote the idea that “today’s radical Islam is a corruption of ‘true Islam.'” That is a LIE, plain and simple.”

            There is no such thing as radical Islam, just Islam.

            As for uniforms in Islam:

            Abul-Fida writes the following in his Tarikh:

            “Then the Prophet asked ‘Abbas to take Abu Sufyan round the valley of Mazeeq and to show him the army of Islam. ‘Abbas said, ‘O Messenger of Allah! Abu Sufyan is a boaster! Perhaps you should give him some distinctive order so that he may have a chance to boast about it among the Quraish.’ The Prophet said, ‘Well, then, whoever seeks refuge in Abu Sufyan’s house shall be given protection. And also he who seeks refuge in the Sacred Mosque and in the house of Hakim Bin Hizam or shuts the door of his house shall be given protection’. ‘Abbas further says, ‘Then I took Abu Sufyan for a review of the Islamic army. At Abu Sufyan’s request, I pointed out to the eminent people from every clan who were present in the Islamic regiments. In the meantime, the Prophet passed by his army, which was clad in green uniforms. Abu Sufyan cried out `O ‘Abbas! Verily your nephew has acquired quite a kingdom!’ ‘Abbas said to him, ‘Woe unto thee! This is no kingship! It is prophethood!”


            Under Islam, one can’t have children or women in civilian wear walking up to IDF troops (or whomever) and exploding the bombs they have hidden, strapped underneath their clothing!

            When Muhammad Ahmad al-Mahdi fought the British in the Sudan in the late 1800s, his army wore uniforms and took prisoners. After he died (shortly after the fall of Khartoum in 1883), his Muslim army continued to wear uniforms until its defeat by General Kitchener in 1897.

            Islam, when obeyed, is quite civilized.

          • Anonymous

            I give up. You either no nothing about Islam, or you are actively in the service of it. Based upon the level of information you just put forth, I think it’s likely the latter.

            Of course, I did take a moment to review your “website” and I find it fascinating that you’re also a “Truther.” I have friends who were at the Pentagon the day it was hit. They SAW the plane. Yet you are clearly dedicated to the idea that “there was no plane.”

            Which sums up everything there is to say about you. You find things which are absolutely false, and build up intricate “networks of deception” around them.

            Islam, when obeyed, is NOT “quite civilized” to anyone who is not a Muslim. Islam, when obeyed, is not “quite civilized” to any woman who isn’t interested in being a piece of property. Islam, when obeyed, is not “quite civilized” to anyone who is a Jew, or a Hindu for that matter, and shall we talk about the “civilized” treatment (under Islam) of the “animists” in Africa?

            You would have been far better off just remaining silent, Dean. Your first posts I read seemed rational, but as you’ve gone on, you’ve made it very clear where your heart is.

            You just pulled out a story which has ZERO to do with any of what we’re talking about, and doesn’t even support the odd point you seem to have been claiming to make. If you really think that these things “connect” in some fashion, well…

            (1) Your statement – “Real Islam is a nice, peaceful belief system which has been corrupted.”

            (2) My statement – “What we call ‘radical islam’ is actually FUNDAMENTAL, CORE ISLAM. It’s not a ‘hijacking of the faith’ at all, it’s a return to the real faith, as put forth by Mohammed (and, allegedly, by Allah).”

            (3) Your response – “This verse ‘proves’ you wrong because I claim it proves that Muslims don’t wear uniforms… even though uniforms are expressly mentioned in the verse, mind you… and today they do (sometimes).” (And pay no attention to the fact that “unforms” have literally nothing to do with the topic we were discussing… look at my other hand!)

            The non-sequitor there is pretty blatant. It reads, frankly, as a “distract and deflect” tactic.

            Of COURSE “Islam, when obeyed, is quite civilized,” though. And had no one stood against Nazis, and everyone had simply surrendered and capitulated to them, the takeover by them would have been “quite civilized” as well. Mao’s “Cultural Revolution” was “quite civilized”… the people being mass-executed were rounded up and exterminated in a very, very orderly fashion.

            Islam is very UNCIVILIZED to anyone who does not capitulate to Islam’s demands. You might want, for example, to look up the historical example (from Mohammed’s own example) of the “Canal of Blood,” for starters.

            But I know that you’ll just respond with another non-sequitor, most likely… intended to distract and deflect. You can’t disprove the commands, both in the Koran and in Mohammed’s “Hadith” commanding and setting the example of extraordinary barbarism… things which are (in “core” Islam) COMMANDED BY ALLAH. So, instead, you can always bring up something about the color of Mohammed’s beard-dye in his later life, and claim it disproves that point.

            You lost all credibility with this one, Dean.

          • Dean Jackson

            clbrown says, “You either no nothing about Islam, or you are actively in the service of it. Based upon the level of information you just put forth, I think it’s likely the latter.”

            Yeah, I’m an Islamic radical that supports Israel and I informed the world about the Arab governments’ “new” “Long-Range Strategy” against Israel, adopted at their first Arab League Summit in Cairo, Egypt in 1964, where the PLO and “Palestinians” were created!

    • Anonymous

      Rick, please read my response to Dean, below… you DO have a point, but it’s over-the-top and more than a little bit inflammatory.

  • Anonymous

    I pray to God that the Israelis exterminate the wretched vermin of Hamas and Hezbollah who deliberately put children in grave danger and that the evil mosques that practice the religion of hate and willingly let themselves be used as ammunition compounds be obliterated.

    To all the Jews in the US that voted for Hussein Obama: shame on you.